Closed nikosbentenitis closed 10 years ago
I suggest the following:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Nikos Bentenitis notifications@github.com wrote:
One of the tasks of the committee is to select and categorize existing educational materials about Bitcoin. The main purpose of this task is to create a list of committee-reviewed materials that Foundation members and members of the general public can access. In addition, the "best" materials from each category will likely be highlighted in the 2015 conference of the Foundation.
In order to make the selection of materials more tractable, it would be useful to find 3-4 categories that these materials will fall into. There have been discussions about the categories in the committee's weekly teleconferences (see the minutes https://github.com/btcfoundationedcom/btcfoundationedcom.github.io/tree/master/minutes) but a more thorough discussion on Github is necessary.
Here are the guidelines:
- Suggest 3-4 categories, no more, and don't suggest subcategories.
- Share your opinion until August 31.
- Refrain from spending much effort criticizing other people's categorizations. This is the so-called "brainstorming" phase. Instead, propose your own categories.
To start the discussion, here are the three categories that I propose:
- Best educational materials for beginners
- Best educational materials for merchants
- Best educational materials for intermediate users
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/btcfoundationedcom/btcfoundationedcom.github.io/issues/30 .
Good question.
I see the categories as being
These more or less resemble sections of forums, come to think of it. However, in the current context there is a specific orientation, which is education on topics 1,2, 3, and 4.
Best Educational Materials about:
The first three are basically rewordings of @DOSHOSTNET's suggestions; the fourth is sort of a combination of @mdhaze's middle two suggestions.
It seems like we have two category directions going here:
1) Bitcoin for <some entity/role>
2) Information on
I'm siding with @harding's suggestions, having been on the phone conference related to this and also tracking the issue here in github. To be a bit more specific, I think that being a bit more general is useful in terms of the categories. Rather than something that's too specific (e.g. businesses or merchants), "organizations" is better (in this context, as a general term for a category). You could get really lost attempting to cover all the bases of organizational differences in different categories. Keep it few. Keep it simple. I agree with @sressler on the concept of tagging.
Thank you all for your submissions. Please vote using this Doodle poll to determine the winning categories.
On a related note, in order to help members of the Bitcoin community submit links with educational materials about Bitcoin, an online form has been set up. The members present at the August 26, 2014 meeting of the committee, agreed that a good start for those categories are those suggested by David A. Harding (Bitcoin for individuals, Bitcoin for organizations, Bitcoin for developers, Bitcoin for policy makers and the press.) Those categories will be changed based on the result of the Doodle poll.
The poll on the categories for the educational materials is now closed. Six people voted and the following categories received the most votes:
Please keep those categories in mind as you choose the educational materials that you can add to our online form or directly into the Zotero group.
One of the tasks of the committee is to select and categorize existing educational materials about Bitcoin. The main purpose of this task is to create a list of committee-reviewed materials that Foundation members and members of the general public can access. In addition, the "best" materials from each category will likely be highlighted in the 2015 conference of the Foundation.
In order to make the selection of materials more tractable, it would be useful to find 3-4 categories that these materials will fall into. There have been discussions about the categories in the committee's weekly teleconferences (see the minutes) but a more thorough discussion on Github is necessary.
Here are the guidelines:
To start the discussion, here are the three categories that I propose: