Open discussion: Reliability of RREP in some scenarios.

[gustavosinbandera1]

        A                         B                      C        
-----------------         -----------------      -----------------
        |                         |                      |
    +-------+                 +-------+              +-------+    
    |       |                 |       |              |       |    
    +-------+                 +-------+              +-------+    
        |      newpkt[B][A]       |                      |        
        <-------------------------|                      |        
        |                         |                      |        
    +-------+                 +-------+              +-------+    
    |       |                 |       |              |       |    
    +-------+                 +-------+              +-------+    
        |                         |     newpkt[C][A]     |        
        <------------------------------------------------|        
        |                         |                      |        
    +-------+                 +-------+              +-------+    
    |       |                 |       |              |       |    
    +-------+                 +-------+              +-------+    
        |                         |                      |        
-----------------         -----------------      -----------------

In the first scenario a packet from B to A is followed by a packet from C to A. when packet from C to A, the new RREQ cannot go more than one hope, because node B now know the route to node A and it would need to send RREP in both directions to origin address and to target address, for actual the code is sending RREQ until to reach destination address, this approach overloads the network

[jeandudey]

Please reword title to Intermediate RREP implementation or some variant of it to represent the intention.

[jeandudey]

This can be closed, Intermediate RREPs pose a security risk.