search

btcz / zhasher

Zhasher for BitcoinZ
MIT License
5 stars 5 forks source link

Testnet worker not authorized #3

Closed Overdrive5 closed 6 years ago

Overdrive5 commented 6 years ago

zhasher -l mine.equipool.1ds.us:49951 -u .worker1 -cv 1 -cd 0

======================= btcz.rocks =======================
    Zhash CPU&GPU Miner for BitcoinZ v1.2.0
Special thanks to tromp for providing CPU and CUDA solvers
======================= btcz.rocks =======================

Setting log level to 2 [14:04:33][0x00007f7e4b92a740] Using SSE2: YES [14:04:33][0x00007f7e4b92a740] Using AVX: NO [14:04:33][0x00007f7e4b92a740] Using AVX2: NO [14:04:33][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Starting miner [14:04:33][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Connecting to stratum server mine.equipool.1ds.us:49951 [14:04:33][0x00007f7e42596700] miner#0 | Starting thread #0 (CUDA-TROMP) GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (#0) BLOCKS=133, THREADS=64 [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Connected! [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Subscribed to stratum server [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] miner | Extranonce is 38000003 [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Target set to 0320000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Received new job #ce5a [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Worker not authorized: t1XVAbVXDbufKU535d9mip9DBherVR8h2X5.worker1 [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Disconnecting [14:04:34][0x00007f7e42d97700] stratum | Stopping miner terminate called without an active exception

Linux Xenial Build. Just want to make sure I have a working miner program when the switch comes. TIA

egyptianbman commented 6 years ago

It doesn't look like you're using a testnet address (they are not cross compatible). You can generate one if you run your node with testnet=1 in your config file. You're also welcome to use one I've generated: tmNMzEYa9T7sVUxVgr85ku7H2Rguh74Hb9T

Overdrive5 commented 6 years ago

OK Good! I'll test with your then. Thanks!

Overdrive5 commented 6 years ago

Errm, It is still doing it. Do you have a worker name?

egyptianbman commented 6 years ago

A worker name isn't required. Can you supply what you're getting now -- with the command you're running?