Open btford opened 7 years ago
I saw that too, and searched a bit around the internet (there’s many more lists like it), and compiled the attached map, that maybe useful to someone!
{
"accurate": "exact",
"afraid": ["fearful", "terrified"],
"angry": "furious",
"annoying": "exasperating",
"bad": ["atrocious", "awful"],
"beautiful": ["exquisite", "gorgeous"],
"big": ["immense", "massive"],
"boring": "dull",
"bright": ["dazzling", "luminous"],
"busy": "swamped",
"calm": "serene",
"capable": "accomplished",
"careful": "cautious",
"cheap": "stingy",
"clean": "spotless",
"clear": "obvious",
"clever": "brilliant",
"cold": "freezing",
"colorful": "vibrant",
"colourful": "vibrant",
"competitive": "cutthroat",
"complete": "comprehensive",
"confused": "perplexed",
"conventional": "conservative",
"creative": "innovative",
"crowded": "bustling",
"cute": "adorable",
"dangerous": "perilous",
"dear": "cherished",
"deep": "profound",
"depressed": "despondent",
"detailed": "meticulous",
"different": "disparate",
"difficult": "arduous",
"dirty": ["filthy", "squalid"],
"dry": ["arid", "parched"],
"dull": "tedious",
"eager": "keen",
"easy": "effortless",
"empty": "desolate",
"evil": "wicked",
"excited": "thrilled",
"exciting": "exhilarating",
"expensive": "costly",
"fancy": "lavish",
"fast": "quick",
"fat": "obese",
"fierce": "ferocious",
"friendly": "amiable",
"frightened": ["alarmed", "terrified"],
"frightening": ["alarming", "terrifying"],
"funny": "hilarious",
"glad": "overjoyed",
"good": ["excellent", "superb"],
"great": "terrific",
"happy": ["ecstatic", "jubilant"],
"hard": "difficult",
"hard-to-find": "rare",
"heavy": "leaden",
"high": "soaring",
"hot": ["scalding", "sweltering"],
"huge": "colossal",
"hungry": ["ravenous", "starving"],
"hurt": "battered",
"important": "crucial",
"intelligent": "brilliant",
"interesting": "captivating",
"kind": "compassionate",
"large": ["colossal", "huge"],
"lazy": "indolent",
"light": "luminous",
"little": "tiny",
"lively": "vivacious",
"long": "extensive",
"long-term": "enduring",
"loose": "slack",
"loud": "deafening",
"loved": "adored",
"lovely": "adorable",
"mean": "cruel",
"messy": "slovenly",
"neat": "immaculate",
"necessary": "essential",
"nervous": "apprehensive",
"nice": "kind",
"noisy": "deafening",
"often": "frequently",
"old": "ancient",
"old-fashioned": "archaic",
"open": ["transparent"],
"painful": "excruciating",
"pale": "ashen",
"perfect": "flawless",
"poor": "destitute",
"powerful": "compelling",
"pretty": "beautiful",
"quick": "rapid",
"quiet": ["hushed", "silent"],
"rainy": "pouring",
"rich": "wealthy",
"risky": "perilous",
"roomy": "spacious",
"rude": "vulgar",
"sad": ["morose", "sorrowful"],
"scared": "petrified",
"scary": "chilling",
"serious": ["grave", "solemn"],
"sharp": "keen",
"shiny": "gleaming",
"short": "brief",
"shy": "timid",
"simple": "basic",
"skinny": "skeletal",
"sleepy": "lethargic",
"slow": "sluggish",
"small": ["petite", "tiny"],
"smart": "intelligent",
"smelly": "pungent",
"smooth": "sleek",
"soft": "downy",
"sorry": "apologetic",
"special": "exceptional",
"strong": ["forceful", "unyielding"],
"stupid": "idiotic",
"sure": "certain",
"sweet": "thoughtful",
"talented": "gifted",
"tall": "towering",
"tasty": "delicious",
"thin": "gaunt",
"thirsty": "parched",
"tight": "constricting",
"tiny": "minuscule",
"tired": ["exhausting", "exhausted"],
"ugly": "hideous",
"unhappy": "miserable",
"upset": "distraught",
"valuable": "precious",
"warm": "hot",
"weak": ["frail", "feeble"],
"well-to-do": "wealthy",
"wet": "soaked",
"wicked": "villainous",
"wide": "expansive",
"willing": "eager",
"windy": "blustery",
"wise": ["sage", "sagacious"],
"worried": ["anxious", "distressed"]
}
This is amazing @wooorm ! Thank you.
@btford I don't know if this is used/address already, but accurate
is misspelled on line one of the object above.
@Slapbox Fixed!
@wooorm thanks for addressing this. Was this ever added in any way to the codebase though? If so it will need to be fixed somewhere in there.
No, it wasn’t, so the work is still to write a PR 😉
Thanks much for the updates!
Is this still up for grabs? I still have not taken a look at the code base, but I like the too a lot. Was there any previous attempts at implementing it? @btford
Via: https://www.fluentland.com/groups/learn-english/forum/topic/words-to-use-instead-of-very-3/