Closed refack closed 7 years ago
With the introduction of async-hooks in v8.x, there should be a way to do this without process.binding('async_wrap');
async-hooks
process.binding('async_wrap');
Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f0f5b0143feb27d3263905cc1c4fd18ef4f5b486 on refack:patch-1 into 7ea43eacc1d726f061ff2fb52e3225d937dfd47f on bucharest-gold:master.
@refack thanks for the contribution - and apologies for the latency. This is a back-burner project for me. 👍
Just trying to limit the use of process.binding('async_wrap'); in the wild.
With the introduction of
async-hooks
in v8.x, there should be a way to do this withoutprocess.binding('async_wrap');