TextualEntity union and adm:access

[xristy]

We discussed during today's call that we really only need adm:access on bdo:Item not on the bdo:Work or bdo:Etext so the domain of adm:access should be bdo:Item.

While looking at this I notice that bdo:TextualEntity is referenced by a bunch of defunct bdo: properties that I need to remove as part of the overall ontology maintenance. These properties are:

• bdo:access
• bdo:attributionName
• bdo:attributionURL
• bdo:contentProvider
• bdo:hasContentProvider
• bdo:hasSteward
• bdo:license

These have been replaced by adm: counterparts.

There are also properties that need to be evaluated as to whether they need to refer to bdo:TextualEntity or not:

• bdo:paginatedBy
• bdo:workMaterial
• bdo:workObjectType

It may turn out that bdo:TextualEntity can be removed from the ontology

[xristy]

Also should adm:contentProvider have as domain bdo:TextualEntity as currently defined or adm:LegalData ==> adm:ContentProvider as currently used in the rfc011 wip? I think the latter evidently but perhaps I've got this bit wrong?

[xristy]

Also adm:access should actually have domain: adm:AdminData ==> adm:Access and the linkage to what the adm:access is about is derived from the adm:adminAbout object

[xristy]

and a constraint that confirms that adm:adminAbout/rdf:type/rdfs:subClassOf bdo:Item