search

buda-base / owl-schema

BDRC Ontology Schema
11 stars 2 forks source link

bdo:sameAsHimalayanArt? #137

Closed eroux closed 5 years ago

eroux commented 5 years ago

the ToL data has some links to Himalayan Art. They are just URLs, not RDF entities and so on, so I'm thinking maybe we could have a subclass of rdfs:seeAlso that would be bdo:seeAlsoHimalayanArt, with a range of xsd:anyUri?

xristy commented 5 years ago

we already have been using rdfs:seeAlso to link to ToL entries (and others) which aren't presented as RDF resources so we should change the uses of this property to adm:seeAlso. The links to Himalayan Art (which can also be useful for deities and so on) can also be adm:seeAlso. If this name is too close to rdfs:seeAlso then perhaps we could use adm:seeOther or adm:more or some such.

Upon further examination I realize that there's a minor mess here:

Note there is also a property, bdo:seeAlso that is unused and deprecated and that I will remove now.

eroux commented 5 years ago

I was thinking of using the same system we have for owl:sameAs where we just make subproperties for the various datasets. It's interesting because it allows us to display the various links differently (with the icon of the corresponding dataset for instance), so I think we should have a version of seeAlso that's specific to Himalayan Art... wdyt?

The links to ToL should be replaced with adm:sameAsToL BTW, as they'll have RDF entities. These have different URIs so in the migration process I think we should just ignore the ToL see also, and add the correct links in a batch update later.

xristy commented 5 years ago

We currently have:

I think it's appropriate to change the above to adm: since they are comments on other metadata versus the RWO.

For now since we do have links to ToL I propose to continue to migrate them and replace when the RDF LoD is ready. We can use a hierarchy like:

and use an annotation like a shacl constraint to indicate the adm:Organization that a subProperty of owl:sameAs and adm:seeOther are associated with

eroux commented 5 years ago

looks good to me, the only small puzzlement I have is why we need an adm:seeOther? Can't we have just adm:seeOtherToL be a subclass of rdfs:seeAlso?

xristy commented 5 years ago

I don't think we should. Per rdfs:seeAlso:

rdfs:seeAlso :  rdfs:Resource ==> rdfs:Resource

so we define the property adm:seeOther:

adm:seeOther :  bdo:Entity ==> xsd:AnyURI

Since the URLs don't (necessarily) point to RDF resources.

Also in your comment do you also agree with re-locating bdo:sameAsrKTs and siblings to the adm: namespace?