Closed eroux closed 7 years ago
I think the TLM administrative properties should be in a separate entity as the rest of the cultural heritage ontology. Maybe something like
bdr:TL0123 a :TLMLibrary; rdfs:label "this or that place"; tlm:email "admin email"; tlm:place bdr:G123; etc.
?
In the latest ontology I've moved the various TLM data properties to the admin ns and made them annotation properties
I think the TLM administrative properties should be in a separate entity as the rest of the cultural heritage ontology. Maybe something like
?