Closed eroux closed 6 years ago
:workPartOf
should be accompanied by an appropriate :workLocation
and sorting the collection of parts by location gives the order.
However, that's pretty contorted so I agree that it would be helpful to have a simple index for both :workPartOf
and the inverse :workHasPart
I agree :workLocation
should be enough for now (although many non-leaf nodes don't specify it in our outlines), but it would be good to have a simple index as you say, especially since there's no location information for abstract works and we may want to specify some parts of it
We currently record that a work is part of another, but we don't record the order of the work parts, and we certainly should. I don't know how BIBFRAME, etc. solved this.