restricted by quality -> low quality

eroux commented 3 years ago

Instead of the restricted by quality mechanism, we're going to implement a new one where we just indicate the low quality. I'll update this with some details about the new data but here are a few UI things to implement:

use an icon on the thumbnails to indicate low quality, something like https://icons8.com/icons/set/low-rate ? (perhaps with the upper wave blurred?)
in the Scans tab, add a message (at the same level as the fairuse / copyright one), saying something like "We acknowledge the poor quality of these scans and apologize for it. We think these might still be useful for scholarship and make them available, while searching for higher quality ones."
in Mirador I think there could be a message? but I'm not sure where and this seems a bit cumbersome so perhaps not...

So, the meaning of the data is now:

if the scans (ex: bdr:W8238) or etext (or anything actually) have bdo:qualityGrade 0 then we should display the aforementioned warning

berger-n commented 3 years ago

thanks for the changes in the data! for the record images at https://library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:W3CN3014 return a 401 error, I'm not sure why?

eroux commented 3 years ago

ok, this query on this page

now contains tmp:hasReproQuality 0, (because it's the quality of the reproduction), and this query has bdo:qualityGrade 0 (because it's a direct property)

berger-n commented 3 years ago

added icon with tooltip in results for Scans & Versions:

+ message on resource page: https://library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:W8238

regarding Mirador I guess we can do something like when images are not available to download (icon+tooltip): https://library.bdrc.io/view/bdr:WEAP676-12-2

eroux commented 3 years ago

looks perfect, thanks!! Good idea about Mirador yes, let's do that!

berger-n commented 3 years ago

finally made it: https://library.bdrc.io/view/bdr:W8238

eroux commented 3 years ago

oh excellent, thanks a lot!!

eroux commented 3 years ago

Let's reformulate the warning to:

We acknowledge the poor quality of these scans (which might be difficult to read or in the wrong order, and we apologize for it. We think these might still be useful for scholarship and make them available, while searching for higher quality ones.

berger-n commented 3 years ago

done: https://library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:W8238

eroux commented 3 years ago

great, thanks!

buda-base / public-digital-library

restricted by quality -> low quality #490