display issues in bdr:W1FEMC020013

[berger-n]

• titles now look a bit better: http://library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:W1FEMC020013

• I guess dates such as "2486"^^bdo:beDate need more specific rendering than just 2486

• regarding Notes I wonder how this is supposed to be rendered too:

  
  bdr:NT5FFD1A061FB7  a  bdo:Note ;
  bdo:noteLocationStatement  "3" ;
  bdo:noteText  "Catalog" ;
  bdo:noteWork  bda:PR1FEMC02 .

bdr:NTBA2765BFDBFA a bdo:Note ; bdo:noteText "Collection Institution" ; bdo:noteWork bda:PR1KDPP01 .

bdr:NTDA88B89ACD5C a bdo:Note ; bdo:noteLocationStatement "1" ; bdo:noteText "Fascicles" .

bdr:NTE38A9ECDAD31 a bdo:Note ; bdo:noteLocationStatement "1" ; bdo:noteText "Work Number" .

especially w.r.t these `Notes` in [bdr:P1583](http://library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:P1583) :

bdr:NT93D338F6A346 a bdo:Note ; bdo:noteLocationStatement "v. 2, pp.104-112" ; bdo:noteText "biography\ndates: 1308-1363"@en ; bdo:noteWork bdr:W25268 .

bdr:NTABB307C08F28 a bdo:Note ; bdo:noteLocationStatement "251" ; bdo:noteText "biodata\n\nSubsequent main lineage holders include lha btsun chen po/ gter chen 'gyur med rdo rje/ 'bri gung rin chen phun tshogs/ rig 'dzin 'jigs med gling pa/ mi 'gyur nam mkha'i rdo rje/ 'jam dbyangs mkhyen brtse'i dbang po\n\nAmong them, 'jigs med gling pa received the nye brgyud via direct vision of klong chen pa. 'jigs med gling pa passed his lineage to rdo grub phrin las 'od zer, who passed it to mi 'gyur nam mkha' rdo rje, who in turn had a vision of klong chen pa and received the yang tig from him."@en ; bdo:noteWork bdr:W27401 .

bdr:NTB25CDA7F0516 a bdo:Note ; bdo:noteLocationStatement "p. 6" ; bdo:noteWork bdr:W19822 .

[berger-n]

BTW in http://purl.bdrc.io/admindata/PR1FEMC02.ttl is bda:PR1FEMC02 adm:adminAbout bda:PR1FEMC02 correct? (need to fix a recursive loop in any case)

[eroux]

let's fix that loop just in case yes, it could be a correct case. Honestly I'm a bit reluctant to spend some energy on the rest now, as the data will change in the near future... let's ignore the UI for notes and dates for now.

[berger-n]

ok

[xristy]

FWIW, the loop is correct. Since the adm:Product concept is a BUDA administrative concept, then its instances live in the bda: namespace and so an instances administrative metadata is adm:adminAbout itself.

The titles look fine and it would be best if the Bibliographic titles are listed first since they're intended to be the standard title in general. All :Works are supposed to have a bibliographic title.

As for dates, I was thinking that displaying dates (other than ^^xsd:integer) could be just like language tagged strings. The same pattern should work nicely. The dates type as ^^xsd:integer are implicitly Common Era dates so if the date has type ^^bdo:ceDate the date can be ignored and treated like all the other dates.

As far as the :Notes, they are displaying fine as is except for the comment I made yesterday about just displaying the :noteLocationStatement even if there is no :noteWork.

It is true that the modeling of the Fascicles and Work Number will change - although I'm not sure when; and the use of Products for the Catalog and Collection Institution will also change; however, for now they allow people involved in the Khmer project to search for and view the information collected to date on the various works.

[xristy]

@berger-n thanks. The titles and dates look nice.

One more thing is that the FEMC Volume II works, e.g., W1FEMC021300, have a triple like:

bda:W1FEMC021300 adm:contentProvider bda:CP041 .

and, when present, it would be nice to display for the bdr:W1FEMC02xxxx, just as the adm:metadataLegal property currently is displayed.

We have many adm:ContentProviders defined and it with time more :Works will have a adm:contentProvider (and adm:metadataProvider) so this change would be of general value.

[xristy]

@berger-n Thanks for the contentProvider. It all looks very nice now