bugadani commented 4 years ago

A different approach to the relaxed collection. Instead of providing a key and an index interface that does the same, separate the two based on type. This builds on the idea that having the relaxed makes the key-based access redundant, and thus it does not provide those methods.

~There's a slight problem with having an object id in relaxed mode, otherwise this is probably the least redundant way to provide a relaxed collection.~

[ ] Tests

codecov-io commented 4 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #10 into master will increase coverage by 1.71%. The diff coverage is 73.23%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #10      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.46%   66.18%   +1.71%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         197      207      +10     
  Branches       28       31       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          127      137      +10     
+ Misses         32       28       -4     
- Partials       38       42       +4

Flag	Coverage Δ
#unittests	`66.18% <73.23%> (+1.71%)`	:arrow_up:

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/lib.rs	`60.86% <70.58%> (+3.98%)`	:arrow_up:
tests/test.rs	`72.82% <80.00%> (-1.04%)`	:arrow_down:

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 0bbad2e...2bcc0dc. Read the comment docs.

bugadani commented 4 years ago

Superseded by #17

bugadani / Slots

Different access modes based on type #10

Codecov Report