v2.23.3 updated bugsnag-cocoa to 5.22.10, which had the side effect of requiring an xcconfig file to compile the BugsnagStatic target. This target is used by RN projects on RN 0.59.x and earlier. This change adds the missing file to the manifest.
How did this happen?
For the v2.23.3 release, I did manual testing against RN 0.61 and expected the CI build to catch anything weird on <0.60, since it builds against an older project. However, the CI build was not running cleanly against the test project and passed where it should have failed. I've raised #440 to address this discrepancy.
How was this change tested?
Tested this change against projects running 0.59.10 and 0.61.5 as well as automating those tests in #440.
v2.23.3 updated bugsnag-cocoa to 5.22.10, which had the side effect of requiring an xcconfig file to compile the
BugsnagStatic
target. This target is used by RN projects on RN 0.59.x and earlier. This change adds the missing file to the manifest.How did this happen?
For the v2.23.3 release, I did manual testing against RN 0.61 and expected the CI build to catch anything weird on <0.60, since it builds against an older project. However, the CI build was not running cleanly against the test project and passed where it should have failed. I've raised #440 to address this discrepancy.
How was this change tested?
Tested this change against projects running 0.59.10 and 0.61.5 as well as automating those tests in #440.
Related issues
Fixes #433