Open NickNisbet opened 9 months ago
The schema looks right to me:
<xs:extension base="ids:propertyType">
<xs:attribute name="uri" type="xs:anyURI" use="optional"/>
Are you referencing the right xsd?
Just to be clear, the 'uri' attribute is only defined for properties in the requirement set, not for properties in the applicability. I wonder if this is a problem to work with bsDD and similar.
Yes, the problem is that I have uri on Applicability facets, as this was allowed previously. Again, I think this is very strange choice to weaken the Applicability facets.
Nick.
Agree with Nick, there is no reason to differentiate between Applicability and Requirement.
While I agree, the process to add this back into the schema seems to push us beyond the reasonable deadline for the next summit. I would suggest to add this to 1.1
first thing that will be in 1.1 :-)
There seems to be something wrong with ids.xsd 0.9.7 It does not accept uri=”” on the property facet.
XMLSPY reports: Attribute 'uri' is not allowed in element