Closed lox closed 1 year ago
Test case: raw_ansi_output.log
Ooh interesting 👍🏼
I have a simplified reproduction based on that 👌🏼
You're on the money, the output is using CSI n D
/ CUB
/ Cursor Back
by n
characters to overwrite the progress bar, and each _bk;ts=…
timestamp throughout the line is consuming one of those CUB
s.
I'll try to turn that into a test case and fix.
I wonder if this is also a bug in the agent's timestamping.
The timestamps in your raw_ansi_output.log
appear in patterns roughly like this:
Hello
<ESC>[0K
<ESC>_bk;ts=…
<ESC>[5D
<ESC>[1B
<ESC>[1A
Which means:
Hello
— 👋🏼 some text already on the line<ESC>[0K
— EL: Erase in Line (n=0: clear from cursor to the end of the line)<ESC>_bk;ts=…
— Buildkite start of line timestamp<ESC>[5D
— CUB: Cursor Back (5 cells)<ESC>[1B
— CUD: Cursor Down 1 line<ESC>[1A
— CUU: Cursor Up 1 line… That's not where we should be putting a timestamp. The <ESC>[0K
is basically saying “I've overwritten part of this line, now ensure everything after the cursor is blanked, in case the old line was longer”. So we're not at the start of a line.
It would be nice if it didn't cause rendering bugs, but that's a separate issue — even if resolved, it would leave out of order timestamps etc.
In the agent a log Prefixer is used to prefix lines with ANSI timestamp, and here's it's detection of escape codes that indicate a new line:
// This regex matches "Erase in Line" escape characters:
// [K Clear from cursor to the end of the line
// [1K Clear from cursor to beginning of the line
// [2K Clear entire line
var lineBreakEscapeCharRegex = regexp.MustCompile(`^\[[012]?K`)
We can see [K Clear from cursor to the end of the line
is included intentionally, and also the equivalent [0K
is handled by the regexp character class.
Here's the Wikipedia description of [nK
:
Clears part of the screen. If n is 0 (or missing), clear from cursor to end of screen. If n is 1, clear from cursor to beginning of the screen. If n is 2, clear entire screen (and moves cursor to upper left on DOS ANSI.SYS). If n is 3, clear entire screen and delete all lines saved in the scrollback buffer (this feature was added for xterm and is supported by other terminal applications).
I imagine we want timestamps in the subset of cases where one of those clears the entire line; including perhaps [0K
when the cursor is at the start of the line but not when it's mid-line. But maybe just not at all.
Fortunately ansi-timestamps
is still in experiment status, so I think we have a bit more freedom to change this behaviour. /cc @moskyb
We are using the Agent
ansi-timestamps
experiment, which injects timestamps into the ANSI output using Application Program Commands. These should be rendered as invisible, much like control characters. It appears this isn't happening:When rendered directly in iTerm2, we see the correct output (even with the ansi timestamps inline):
I suspect this will be affecting lots of different types of progress bars when ansi-timestamps is enabled.
I suspect this is because the handling of the APCs is appending an element to the virtual screen, which will then increase the X count, meaning it throws out any ANSI control characters that are clearing the progress bar part way through with backspace control chars (vs erasing the whole line).