Closed natalieparellano closed 3 years ago
I think it’s better to try to cover as much as we can over allowing people to join only part of it.
@yaelharel this makes sense to me. Added a suggestion: https://github.com/buildpacks/community/pull/106/files#r661734919
I love this! The additional structure with time limits is the my favorite bit - I think one thing that might be missing is what happens when someone runs out of time for the topic. I think a more formal - continue this discussion async in #slack-channel
mechanism may be needed. Maybe having a #working-group
channel so folks can dump questions during a talk without interrupting would help drive more async communication.
Should we merge this given that we have roughly been following this for the last meetings?
@natalieparellano once the conflicts are fixed we should be good to go :)
@samj1912 sounds good! The conflicts should be fixed now.
From previous conversations, here are some ideas to improve our working group:
We should:
With all that said, this PR proposes a structured agenda for working group. We could use any free time that opens up from discussions that end early to cover “quick” topics or silent read the RFC for the next topic.