Open braunsonm opened 6 months ago
Hey @jjbustamante, I want to give it a try. Could you please assign this to me?
Hi @jjbustamante , I would like to take a look if this is available
@prashantrewar were you still working on this one, or could @rashadism have it?
@natalieparellano, I apologize, I'm busy with something. @rashadism you can feel free to try it.
Thank you!
@jjbustamante @natalieparellano Hi can u review the PR
Description
Right now we can provide a
docker://
URI for the buildpacks listed in a builder inside thebuilder.toml
but we cannot do the same thing with thelifecycle
.Proposed solution
Describe alternatives you've considered
Right now you need to provide a link to the tar.gz and cannot use docker images.
Additional context
The reason this would be a great quality of life feature is primarily because almost all the other fields in the specification allow
docker://
archives. This would be consistent and not require a separate location for storage of the lifecycle binaries. It is a bit inconsistent that at build time you are able to specify a custom lifecycle image, but you can't do the same when you are packaging a builder.