Open natalieparellano opened 1 year ago
@wanjunlei would you like me to assign you this issue?
@wanjunlei would you like me to assign you this issue?
Yes
What is the status of this RFC ? @natalieparellano
@cmoulliard I believe it's just waiting to be implemented. @wanjunlei were you able to pick this up?
Hi @natalieparellano I'd like to work on this RFC if @wanjunlei didn't have the time to do so :)
Sorry, I don't have time to work on this feature at the moment, it would be great if you could.
Thanks @wanjunlei! @natalieparellano can you assign it to me, please? 🙏🏼
Hey @natalieparellano , I created the issue on spec, can you update the tracking issue please?
Do we know when this new feature supporting insecure registry will be released (lifecycle, etc) ? @natalieparellano
Due other priorities I'm slowly working on it. It required to refactor and test imgutil (https://github.com/buildpacks/imgutil/pull/211) and of course to be tested and integrated on lifecycle. Additionally it requires to have the docs and the spec updated.
As you can see it has lots of parts that needed to be updated and tested so it will require a bit. @cmoulliard
Hey @natalieparellano, can you update this issue with the pack's issue I just opened? https://github.com/buildpacks/pack/issues/1916 Thanks
@natalieparellano Also I thought about the documentation issue, I think that the documentation will be automatically updated whenever we ship lifecycle, right? (I'm talking about the parameter and the description). Is there other places where we need to update the doc? (if there is a way to do so)
RFC #0111 - Insecure registries
Spec:
TBD
Lifecycle:
TBD
Pack:
TBD
Documentation: