Unable to find gmock.h during build

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. building libjingle with hammer.sh

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
expected build of libjingle, instead the following error appears:
linbox@linbox-VB:/src/libjingle/talk$ hammer.sh
scons: Reading SConscript files ...

scons: warning: The build_dir keyword has been deprecated; use the variant_dir 
keyword instead.
File "/src/swtoolkit/site_scons/site_init.py", line 203, in 
BuildEnvironmentSConscripts
scons: done reading SConscript files.
scons: Building targets ...
scons: `all_libraries' is up to date.
scons: `all_programs' is up to date.
________Compiling build/dbg/obj/session/phone/devicemanager_unittest.o
In file included from session/phone/devicemanager_unittest.cc:42:0:
/src/libjingle/talk/base/fileutils_mock.h:38:39: fatal error: 
testing/base/public/gmock.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
scons: *** [build/dbg/obj/session/phone/devicemanager_unittest.o] Error 1
scons: building terminated because of errors.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Ubuntu 11.10

Please provide any additional information below.
It appears to be an issue with gtest, but I do not know what I need to 
install/modify. I do not have a /testing directory.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by frimsa...@gmail.com on 2 Nov 2011 at 6:46

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
I'm using libjingle 0.6.3 on ubuntu 11.10

Original comment by frimsa...@gmail.com on 2 Nov 2011 at 6:47

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I have experienced the same issue.
Also, I am installing libjingle 0.6.3 on ubuntu 11.04.

Original comment by josephzh...@gmail.com on 6 Nov 2011 at 11:35

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by jun...@google.com on 8 Nov 2011 at 12:58

• Changed state: Accepted

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It will be fixed in the next release 0.6.4. Thanks for reporting this issue.

Original comment by jun...@google.com on 8 Nov 2011 at 4:59

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Does you have a work around for this or can you give an indication of a release 
date for 0.6.4?
Thanks 

Original comment by mrco...@gmail.com on 3 Dec 2011 at 12:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Found a work around by copying the contents of gmock1.6.0/includes/gmock 
into the folder testing/base/public/ 
and copying the same folder (gmock1.6.0/includes/gmock) into the talk folder.
I obtained gmock from 
http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/downloads/detail?name=gmock-1.6.0.zip&can=2&
q=

Problem now is 
________Compiling build/dbg/obj/session/phone/devicemanager_unittest.o
________Compiling build/dbg/obj/session/phone/dummydevicemanager_unittest.o
________Compiling build/dbg/obj/session/phone/filemediaengine_unittest.o
________Compiling build/dbg/obj/session/phone/filevideocapturer_unittest.o
________Compiling build/dbg/obj/session/phone/mediamessages_unittest.o
________Compiling build/dbg/obj/session/phone/mediasession_unittest.o
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc: In member function ‘virtual void 
MediaSessionDescriptionFactoryTest_TestCreateAudioOffer_Test::TestBody()’:
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc:129:3: error: converting ‘false’ to 
pointer type for argument 1 of ‘char 
testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(testing::internal::Secret*)’ 
[-Werror=conversion-null]
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc: In member function ‘virtual void 
MediaSessionDescriptionFactoryTest_TestCreateVideoOffer_Test::TestBody()’:
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc:155:3: error: converting ‘false’ to 
pointer type for argument 1 of ‘char 
testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(testing::internal::Secret*)’ 
[-Werror=conversion-null]
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc:161:3: error: converting ‘false’ to 
pointer type for argument 1 of ‘char 
testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(testing::internal::Secret*)’ 
[-Werror=conversion-null]
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc: In member function ‘virtual void 
MediaSessionDescriptionFactoryTest_TestCreateAudioAnswer_Test::TestBody()’:
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc:185:3: error: converting ‘false’ to 
pointer type for argument 1 of ‘char 
testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(testing::internal::Secret*)’ 
[-Werror=conversion-null]
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc: In member function ‘virtual void 
MediaSessionDescriptionFactoryTest_TestCreateVideoAnswer_Test::TestBody()’:
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc:213:3: error: converting ‘false’ to 
pointer type for argument 1 of ‘char 
testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(testing::internal::Secret*)’ 
[-Werror=conversion-null]
session/phone/mediasession_unittest.cc:218:3: error: converting ‘false’ to 
pointer type for argument 1 of ‘char 
testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(testing::internal::Secret*)’ 
[-Werror=conversion-null]
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

Original comment by mrco...@gmail.com on 3 Dec 2011 at 1:24

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I see the same problem with the proxydetect_unittest.cpp added in r96 including 
fileutil.h which interns including the elusive "testing/base/public/gmock.h"

Original comment by dlewa...@connectify.me on 3 Dec 2011 at 2:06

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This was marked fixed, but is still broken in 0.6.5.

Original comment by bprodo...@connectify.me on 13 Dec 2011 at 3:37

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This is not fixed in 0.6.6

Original comment by tree1...@gmail.com on 9 Jan 2012 at 2:38

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Right.  In svn r105, that file is still included in the following source files:

talk/app/webrtc/mediastreamhandler_unittest.cc
talk/app/webrtc/mediastream_unittest.cc

Original comment by bprodo...@connectify.me on 9 Jan 2012 at 3:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

the old dependency issue has been fixed,but it seems a new dependency has been 
introduce by another CL. I'll take a look soon,

Original comment by jun...@google.com on 9 Jan 2012 at 4:03

• Changed state: Accepted

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by jun...@google.com on 26 Mar 2012 at 6:38

• Changed state: New

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by jun...@google.com on 26 Mar 2012 at 6:40