Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
First, you shoot yourself in the foot and then, you request an auto-heal
function?
Wouldn't the obvious solution be to
a) leave out the Microsoft blocklist if you use Windows Update, MSN Messenger,
their
OS (insert all other stuff here)
or b) to add the specific IPs to the whitelist? You can already do that right
now.
Cheers, Fred
Original comment by frederic...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2009 at 7:46
Yup, Frederick's highlighted the workaround. There is a "Microsoft" list
available
at iblocklist.com: setting the URL for this list as an "allow" list should get
Windows Update working, though it will of course also allow permanent contact to
Microsoft from your machine.
Having unique per-application list-configurations would actually be a pretty
slick
idea, though it would require a significant amount of work to implement. While
I
wouldn't expect that we'll get to looking at this in more detail for awhile, I
will
leave it open to track the feature request so we don't forget about it.
Thank you for the suggestion!
Original comment by peerbloc...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2009 at 12:16
Check the Windows Firewall options. You can exactly choose which programs are
allowed
through and which are not.
Original comment by frederic...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2009 at 9:33
I believe that a Process Whitelist would be a major usability enhancement but I
think
it would be difficult to perform as it makes it more like a Firewall. I would
say
that it is an almost essential feature.
I used to use Outpost Firewall V3.5/4 with Blockpost plugin and that was heaven
for
IP blocking as it had a whitelist which applications which I didn't want
blocked to
be put on such as Browsers, D/L managers and messengers. This meant that I did
not
have to keep messing around trying to remove IP addresses from the IP blocklist
just
to browse the web which gets so annoying and time consuming.
Original comment by Mighty.M...@gmail.com
on 28 Oct 2009 at 10:37
It wouldn't be too hard (comparatively), I imagine peerblock knows which
executable
communication is coming from. You could just display the program the block is
coming
from in the activity log, then have a right click option to white list that
program.
Original comment by brent.ne...@gmail.com
on 29 Nov 2009 at 8:56
As of right now this is the only reason I don't use PeerBlock over an
individual ip
filter list for one program. A process whitelist would be wonderful. ;)
Original comment by shi...@elite-systems.org
on 3 Jun 2010 at 4:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
PiciM...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2009 at 4:04