Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Far too often I observe that the PeerBlock window size (based on user setting
or preference) is lost on shutdown and re-start. This includes where the
window appears on the screen (relative position) and PeerBlock display size -
absolute size (width and height).
Possibly the PeerBlock display area (width and height)could be embedded as a
preferred setting by user - where even when the window position on the display
may be lost (reverts to the PeerBlock default position - which may not be
editable by user or need to be - but re-sizing of the PeerBlock Display Window
over an over is a pain that should have to be done by user - as this likely
could be an embedded user setting that is retained on startup. Moving a window
is much less of a problem than re-sizing it. Moveover - it is ensuring we have
the display show what we need or want to see over and over is retained - rather
than the relative screen position - which has a nuisance effect - but less so.
HTH
Original comment by mpdoo...@gmail.com
on 27 Feb 2012 at 10:51
[deleted comment]
Regarding items 1 and 2: Optimum does not mean minimum. (I disagree with 1 and
2 as stated.)
The optimal (for information display) size of everything is dependent upon your
display font, size, etc. Any fixed size (or presumption about how many X's fit)
is generally a poor solution. I don't know whether the current minimum window
size you refer to takes display settings into account, but if it doesn't then
the minimum is most certainly not the optimum.
Windows should default to the same dimensions (and position) that they each had
the last time they were displayed. If you found you had to keep reminimizing
your window's size it'd beg the question: Is the minimum really as optimal as
you think it is? (Your behavior would suggest otherwise.) If you don't want to
see a vertical scroll bar, leave your window at its minimum size and your log
length at however many rows fit within that minimum given your display settings.
Auto-sizing columns roughly as you've described, however, I agree with.
If the window size were to default to anything other than the most recent, it
would make sense for it to be the size necessary to contain the (auto-sized)
columns without scroll-bars. This is not necessarily the current minimum size
you refer to.
Original comment by wearenot...@gmail.com
on 14 Aug 2012 at 12:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
frederic...@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2009 at 9:42