Closed teg closed 4 years ago
Love it! Reduced one more special case and instead assigns a natural behavior to self-activating service files that carry no activation information.
I restarted the CI and will merge it if it passes.
Meh, CI probably needs a rebase on master.
If SystemdService and Exec are both missing from the service files then we still treat the name as activatable, but no explicit action is needed from us in order to start it (it is going to be started by the system, and activation is only used to avoid a race).
See discussion here: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/14405