Bridge area added to the map

[tsobuskerudbyen]

Can man_made=bridge areas be added to the map? Like the standard OSM layer, but with a bit more transparency? Gray colour is fine. name can be added as well here.

[Beck-berry]

@tsobuskerudbyen I don't get what you mean by "like the standard OSM layer". For example, this rail bridge in Drammen looks like we have now, there's no special background or anything - what do I miss? Bridges of bigger routes already have a name, too. See Holmenbrua bridge (although it's not man_made). Or did you think of something else?

[Beck-berry]

I added the names like this:

[tsobuskerudbyen]

Do we see things differently? This is what I mean on your example on the rail bridge in Drammen over. In my map it looks like the railway is just laid on top of the water and crossing the path on the same level. :)

[Beck-berry]

Where did you get the first (OSM standard) from? I must be the one who checked it at the wrong place. On openstreetmap.org I only see an outline for these bridges, with no fill. Otherwise I get the point know, so here is an example:

I added it with a 14 minzoom, so it won't be all grey on higher zoom levels.

Does it look OK for you?

[Beck-berry]

@leonardehrenfried We face a problem with some of the bridges:

As far as I could find the answer, this is because the arriving data is splitted and thus we cannot render the filling correctly. Did you see this before? Is there a good solution?

We could go with an outline solution without any problem, if it is also ok for @tsobuskerudbyen? (However it is not as informative, I think.)

[tsobuskerudbyen]

Strange artifacts. Let us see if Leonard has a comment here. But, both the outline and the "filled box" sees to have layer problems, as cycle infrastructure, roads and foot paths seem to stay on top. Example: