buskerudbyen / cycling-norway

3 stars 2 forks source link

Marked one-way roads that can be cycled both ways with a green arrow the cycling-only way #99

Closed tsobuskerudbyen closed 6 months ago

tsobuskerudbyen commented 8 months ago

One-way roads that are tagged with the possibility to cycle both should be marked better - oneway=yes and oneway:bicycle=no. If the route is recommended on these roads now it looks like it is a mistake. Should be no conflicts with locations where there are cycle paths one or both directions.

The Cycle Map standard layer in OSM has a good solution to this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10483726#map=18/59.74472/10.20154&layers=C image Our solution: https://sykkelveier.no/#18.4/59.744885/10.201917 image This road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8198236

leonardehrenfried commented 6 months ago

We could change the arrow to be only applicable for bicycles or we could come up with a more complex visualisation. Which one do you prefer, @tsobuskerudbyen ?

tsobuskerudbyen commented 6 months ago

I prefer to make the arrow as close to what the Cycle Map standard layer in OSM have, please. Then a cyclist will be abel to see that it is a one way street for motor traffic.

Beck-berry commented 6 months ago

It will look like this:

Image

tsobuskerudbyen commented 6 months ago

Great. One thing: Can the green colour on the arrow be the same as cycle infrastructure in the map in general (top right in the screenshot you just made).

tsobuskerudbyen commented 6 months ago

Possible to fix and deploy this one before a presentation tomorrow? (I have fixed a lot of one way streets in Gjøvik.)

leonardehrenfried commented 6 months ago

Sorry, @Beck-berry is not available today and no mergable PR exists yet.

tsobuskerudbyen commented 6 months ago

No worries. I can show it in OSM.

leonardehrenfried commented 6 months ago

Short update: @Beck-berry is available and has pushed the fix, however it will take around 4 hours to compute the entirety of Norway. So, depending when exactly your meeting is, you might see it already or might not. :crossed_fingers: