Open DavidTingley opened 6 years ago
Does this have functionality on top of the Matlab built-in smoothing functions?
On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:41 PM, David Tingley notifications@github.com wrote:
Just found an issue with Smooth.m when it handles linear data. it prepends/appends the flipped data, to a vector, then smooths. This works well for circular data, but causes linear variables to greatly diverge from their inputs. Run these two for comparison:
Smooth([1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0],2) Smooth([0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0],2)
Will fix in the dev branch this week, and close this when it's PRed to master
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Hey thanks David... How will you fix? There are many potential fixes to this all with different issues.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 8:55 PM Dan Levenstein notifications@github.com wrote:
Does this have functionality on top of the Matlab built-in smoothing functions?
On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:41 PM, David Tingley notifications@github.com wrote:
Just found an issue with Smooth.m when it handles linear data. it prepends/appends the flipped data, to a vector, then smooths. This works well for circular data, but causes linear variables to greatly diverge from their inputs. Run these two for comparison:
Smooth([1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0],2) Smooth([0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0],2)
Will fix in the dev branch this week, and close this when it's PRed to master
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/buzsakilab/buzcode/issues/256#issuecomment-429678853, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADXrTdrJ2scyRYZJ4MKCQzBqMp_SuleJks5uk90LgaJpZM4Xba0P .
Just found an issue with Smooth.m when it handles linear data. it prepends/appends the flipped data, to a vector, then smooths. This works well for circular data, but causes linear variables to greatly diverge from their inputs. Run these two for comparison:
Smooth([1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0],2)
Smooth([0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0],2)
Will fix in the dev branch this week, and close this when it's PRed to master