Unreasonable NFR

[bwangpj]

This NFR is unreasonable (and certainly not met by the product).

[nus-se-script]

Team's Response

Briefly mentioned as a NFR but cybersecurity is not a point of this module.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

NFR No.7 is not resonably achievable.

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

All data of patients can be deleted by a single command clear and no way to trace back. The data file storing patients data can be changed and deleted directly.

---

_{[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S1/pe-interim#5904] [original labels: type.DocumentationBug severity.High]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Secure storage of our system is briefly mentioned in our NFR but it is not the point of this module.

We want to protect data from cyber attacks and leaks which has nothing to do with clear or delete as well. Furthermore, it was also cautioned in the UG that delete should be used very carefully as data is UNRECOVERABLE

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• [ ] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---

## :question: Issue response Team chose [`response.NotInScope`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** The requirement is neither unambiguous, testable, nor clear. What does it mean to use "extremely secure security software"? 

---

## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Low`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** Not a purely cosmetic issue, concerns the content of NFR.

---