Closed ax3l closed 1 year ago
Hi @ax3l Thanks for enlightening me about these other tools! I have added references to them in the above commit.
@ax3l, I updated as per your comments in this commit (sorry I forgot to tag this issue). I had to make a few more minor changes to fix some typos, but that commit contains the bulk of the corrections
Thanks a lot @bwheelz36. Please excuse the delay.
I noticed one detail and commented a suggestion in
Thank you for the JOSS submission in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5375 .
This is question is related to #151 and #156.
Recent Toolkits for Beam Analysis
Related to paper
Over the recent years, a couple of our colleagues implemented new analysis packages that might be interesting to either be compatible with with cite as more recent related works. In particular, I am thinking of these packages:
Accelerator Physics Codes
Additionally to the Wikipedia page linked as
“Accelerator Physics Codes” (2022)
and maintained by our colleague David Sagan, maybe these catalogue that we created in the Consortium for Advanced Modeling of Particle Accelerators (CAMPA) are useful:Related by biased, I do work on this set of accelerator modeling codes:
The paper quotes
I fully agree. We hope to overcome this, since we actively standardize I/O with openPMD in many of these codes (see #156). Thus, the first sentence could maybe be rephrased slightly or cite projects like openPMD (2015)?