Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Just like with robotics, you have your sensors, actuators, and processor unit.
One
should not want to toggle the sensors, only the actuators.
Original comment by brandtda...@gmail.com
on 8 Mar 2010 at 7:50
As we add different types of modules through development this would be an item
that
would be covered. As I would like to have a remote definition that fits your
idea of
an actuator. It has on/off as separate buttons, but no state.
So, this feature would be a request for a monitor icon with no actionable items.
Original comment by bwsamuels@gmail.com
on 8 Mar 2010 at 9:21
That is correct a sensor could be monitored but not toggled. An actuator could
be
monitored and toggled.
Original comment by brandtda...@gmail.com
on 8 Mar 2010 at 9:41
A motion sensor would not necessarily have to be monitored because they are
triggered
very quickly, however the dusk sensors would be nice to monitor as well as any
contact closures, or flood sensors, etc...
Original comment by brandtda...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2010 at 8:02
The sensor that is async could display the last time it was triggered. I think
that
may be available through heyu.
Original comment by bwsamuels@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2010 at 3:28
After creating the "other" type for V1.1 I have a better idea on how this can be
handled. I thing we need to add an addition to the alias of the type of module
independent of the subtype (lights, appliances, irrigation, shutter or other).
Original comment by bwsamuels@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2010 at 1:31
I have seen a few discussions on the users group looking for separating the
type and the module actions. i.e.: have a "Light" but only has on/off, no
dimming.
Original comment by bwsamuels@gmail.com
on 19 Jan 2011 at 1:37
I have implemented a status type module that does not have any controls, but
shows state of on/off
Original comment by bwsamuels@gmail.com
on 21 Feb 2011 at 1:53
I have implemented a status type module that does not have any controls, but
shows state of on/off
Original comment by bwsamuels@gmail.com
on 21 Feb 2011 at 1:53
This issue was closed by revision r834.
Original comment by bwsamuels@gmail.com
on 23 Feb 2011 at 3:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
brandtda...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2010 at 6:04