I have tried to implement the domain structure where we put our interface of Usecase and Repository in the domain module and are very close to the domain struct.
I very much so liking this approach as it solves our circular dependency, is closer to Domain-driven dev, and abstracts away our model from being too close to the DB schema.
But I have a peculiar case:
I am reimplementing this in an existing service that was up and running, meaning the DB schema is pretty much set (or very hard to migrate). Currently, my DB schema is not quite the same as the domain models, for example (this is not our real case but an example case):
// This is our DB schema
type SchemaUser struct {
gorm.Model
UserID uint
OtherRelatedID uint
Phone string
}
// This is our User domain model
type DomainUser struct {
ID uint
Name string
PhoneNumber string
Email string
DeviceTokens map[string]string
I found myself confused as to how should I structure the Repository interface. I tried to only put the domain model in the repository interface such as:
type DomainUserRepository interface {
UpsertUser(ctx context.Context, value *DomainUser) error
FetchOneByPhone(ctx context.Context, phone string) (*DomainUser, error)
}
But then not every field from SchemaUser is contained inside our DomainUser and vice versa, meaning that:
When calling UpsertUser we need to add method params to fill in the blanks -> Not a big problem
We need to map the model from DomainUser and SchemaUser, increasing the complexity of the repository
When FetchOneByPhone we will have empty fields inside DomainUser -> BIG PROBLEM
What should I do? some of the potential solutions as I understand it:
I should refactor DomainUser after all to match with the DB Schema
I could just introduce SchemaUser into the domain and allow the repository to have SchemaUser as the method's return value and param
I should split the user's implementation into more specific cases, as currently, the definition of Domain user is a bit broad and being handled by several domains.
Create a converter that can convert PO to Domain Object or Domain Object to PO. The converter can be a separate class or method, or it can be a method of Domain Object or PO itself
I have tried to implement the
domain
structure where we put our interface of Usecase and Repository in thedomain
module and are very close to the domain struct.I very much so liking this approach as it solves our circular dependency, is closer to Domain-driven dev, and abstracts away our model from being too close to the DB schema.
But I have a peculiar case:
I am reimplementing this in an existing service that was up and running, meaning the DB schema is pretty much set (or very hard to migrate). Currently, my DB schema is not quite the same as the domain models, for example (this is not our real case but an example case):
I found myself confused as to how should I structure the
Repository
interface. I tried to only put the domain model in therepository
interface such as:But then not every field from
SchemaUser
is contained inside ourDomainUser
and vice versa, meaning that:UpsertUser
we need to add method params to fill in the blanks -> Not a big problemDomainUser
andSchemaUser
, increasing the complexity of the repositoryFetchOneByPhone
we will have empty fields insideDomainUser
-> BIG PROBLEMWhat should I do? some of the potential solutions as I understand it:
DomainUser
after all to match with the DB SchemaSchemaUser
into the domain and allow the repository to haveSchemaUser
as the method's return value and paramDomain
user is a bit broad and being handled by several domains.Any help will be greatly appreciated.