Open paul-bio opened 3 years ago
and also bin abundance table.
It looks like something about the "unbinned" cluster is throwing it off - the abundance line states: unbinned nan nan
. The nan
is not a valid value for pandas, and hence it cant plot it. I don't know what caused it to be nan
to begin with (empty fasta file?) but its not normal to include the "unbinned" section of the assembly at this stage of analysis, so I would just remove it and rerun. Also, place the -t
flag in your command before the list of files, or it wont be read in.
Here is my refinement command,
$metaWRAP -o -A -t 32 -m 60 -c 70 -x 10 --skip-checkm --keep-ambiguous
I don't know what caused un binned section. Anyway in the bin_abundance_table.txt, there were 201 bin in total.
So could I think maximum number of species in two samples are 201?
If that's right, can I just regard this bin table as an OTU table? And do further analysis with this table maybe I could use this file with another visualization program.
Yes, its better to use your own visualization from this point. The bin_abundance_table.txt
is like an OTU table, but for MAGs.
Hi, Ursky. I solve the problem. In the quant module, I put refined_bin in the -b option. However in the bin_abundance_table, there were unassigned bins. ex bin2, or bin100..... So I removed those bins in the refined_bin directory. And rerun the quant module again, and it worked.
Thanks for advice ursky👍
Hi Ursky. I encountered some error in the quant_bin module. I ran assembly with megahit with -l 500 option, and in the binning module i use concoct only. So I have only one bin set A(from concoct). Bin_refinement was done right after binning. As I have only one bin set, bin_refinement was done within 2 minutes(output Final best bins). And with this Final best bins(directory) I ran quant_bin.
as you told me, I put 4 raw data(it is trimmed) rather than concatenated 2 reads(forward, reverse)
can you give me any recommandation?