Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Instead of adding additional parameters we should carry over modifications to
the
|request| object. That way the user can change the URL, method and post data in
addition to the headers.
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 21 Feb 2010 at 3:53
Patch attached.
Original comment by esiro...@gmail.com
on 24 Feb 2010 at 1:36
Attachments:
Your patch looks good generally but there's one thing we need to think about
further.
Your patch treats changing the request's URL member the same as setting the
|redirectUrl| parameter. However, setting the |redirectUrl| parameter causes the
current request is canceled and the equivalent of a 403 redirect is executed.
Is
this the behavior that we want when changing the request's URL member?
I see two potential options.
(1) Treat changing the request's URL member the same as setting |redirectUrl|
(which
your patch does).
(2) Proceed with the modified request, including the changed URL member.
If we go with #1 then the |redirectUrl| parameter becomes redundant. However,
#1
also builds the erroneous expectation that the other request values will also
be sent
to the new URL, which is not the case for |redirectUrl|. If with go with #2
then the
user's expectation is preserved and the user can do other cool things like
transparently proxying certain requests.
Consequently, I think #2 might be the clearer and more useful approach. What
do you
think?
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 24 Feb 2010 at 6:07
I'm glad you took the time to consider the request URL aspect of the change. I
was
venturing a guess as to what the right thing to do was. I didn't even know
whether
changing the request's URL at the point at which the callback is fired would
work.
(I guess I could have tried, huh?)
I agree #2 seems like a better approach primarily because it prevents confusion
with
respect to |redirectUrl|.
Would you like me to update the patch? I'm also fine with it if you want to
take it
from here to completion.
Original comment by esiro...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2010 at 5:00
How about updating the patch and testing that it works? ;-)
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2010 at 6:22
I've updated esiroker's patch to be compatible with r94. I also incorporated
the URL suggestion above, which was done with the following change:
- if(requestUrl != originalUrl)
- redirectUrl = requestUrl;
+ if(requestUrl != originalUrl) {
+ params->url = GURL(WideToUTF8(requestUrl));
+ redirectUrl.clear(); // Request URL trumps redirect URL
+ }
With this change, I was able to swap out resources in cefclient by changing the
request url rather than using resource streams.
Original comment by mikeyk...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2010 at 4:57
Attachments:
Committed with minor style changes as revision 95.
Original comment by magreenb...@gmail.com
on 30 Aug 2010 at 8:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
magreenb...@gmail.com
on 5 Jul 2009 at 5:49