Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Are you saying that Filter.some("friends", Filter.in("id", Collection<X.id()>))
did
work successfully and gave you the results you wanted?
Also, what do you mean by the "Collection<...>" syntax?
I'm sorry that the usage is sort of confusing for these filters. Hopefully I
can get
some better examples up sometime. In the mean time, both of the following
options
should work for your case. If not, then there may be a bug in the framework.
Filter.some("friends", Filter.equal("", X);
Filter.some("friends", Filter.equal("id", X.getId());
There is also a blog entry that has some more examples: http://java-generic-
dao.blogspot.com/2008/12/search-capability-needs-to-be-able-to.html
Original comment by dwolvert
on 13 May 2009 at 7:23
>Are you saying that Filter.some("friends", Filter.in("id",
Collection<X.id()>)) did
>work successfully and gave you the results you wanted?
Yes it does.
Collection<X.id()> is my shortcut of:
List<Integer> idList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (X x : getCollectionOfTypeX()) { idList.add(x.getId());}
search.addFilter(Filter.some("friends", Filter.in("id", idList))));
search.addFetch("friends")
this works well but is "ugly" code. I prefer the example of your blog entry:
Filter.some("friends", Filter.in("", collectionOfFriends))
I think it could be more distinguishable if you provide something like
Filter.in(Collection<?> collection).
BTW many thanks for this very helpfull framework.
Original comment by c.dittbe...@digitec.de
on 14 May 2009 at 5:16
Will not change API. Will add more examples of Filters to the documentation.
Original comment by dwolvert
on 27 May 2009 at 6:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
c.dittbe...@digitec.de
on 13 May 2009 at 1:46