search

bytecode77 / pe-union

Crypter, binder & downloader with native & .NET stub, evasive by design, user friendly UI
https://bytecode77.com/pe-union
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
647 stars 145 forks source link

modifying stub #20

Closed Elon-Sarif closed 2 years ago

Elon-Sarif commented 2 years ago

first of all i'd love to thank you for the immense work u've made :)

so u've said that only the stub needed modification to be FUD. but i dont know where to look at in the code lmao.

when i open the pe-union.sln file in VS, could u give me some indication as where to look at ? (peunion, pebuild or pe compiler folder?

im relatively new to this game, sorry if it seems to be a dumb question.

also if u have some tips to make it FUD i'd love to hear from a pro.

thanks for everything

bytecode77 commented 2 years ago

when i open the pe-union.sln file in VS, could u give me some indication as where to look at ? (peunion, pebuild or pe compiler folder?

Under SlnBin/Stub you have both stubs.

im relatively new to this game, sorry if it seems to be a dumb question.

also if u have some tips to make it FUD i'd love to hear from a pro.

You really need to have the skills in order to pull something like this off. If you previously were just a user of crypters, then writing one or FUDding an existing will be a very difficult task. It always takes time to get there...

Elon-Sarif commented 2 years ago

i thought that maybe by adding some junk code it would do the trick lmao.

do u maybe have some tips of what should i start learning in order to make this stub fud again?

bytecode77 commented 2 years ago

In the beta, the amount of junk code was acutally configurable - until I have discovered that it increases the detection rate. So, I have removed that option to not lead users into worsening their detection score. Now the amount of junk code is constant.

do u maybe have some tips of what should i start learning in order to make this stub fud again?

You have two options: If you want to write a crypter or FUD an existing one, you have to start from zero and figure out what works best by reading + trial and error. That's the only way, since there is nobody or forum that will teach for free how to become a good reverse engineer or hacker.

If that's not your passion at all and you're looking for an efficient solution, then there's crypters that cost money. They cost money because it's a rather time consuming job to develop such software, as I have mentioned in FUD.md.

Elon-Sarif commented 2 years ago

yup i understand completly. but yeah u've already made a fantastic job with this stub

by any change could u redirect me to someone who's selling crypting service?

bytecode77 commented 2 years ago

Since I have no need to buy a crypter, I don't know which paid product is the best. Only thing I know is that it's work to maintain a crypter FUD which is the reason that free ones, like mine, are not FUD - regardless of overall quality of the project.

But if you just need something to use on your binaries, you'll find one ;) Have fun