search

bytecodealliance / governance

Apache License 2.0
11 stars 37 forks source link

A Proposal to create a Sig Embedded #79

Closed woodsmc closed 7 months ago

woodsmc commented 8 months ago

Hello folks, please accept this PR as a formal request to establish an embedded / Industrial IoT Special Interest Group. The proposal has generated a considerable amount of interest both inside the bytecode alliance and outside it. This might, potentially, lead to new members joining our Bytecode Alliance family. I’d be delighted to discuss the proposal in more detail at your convenience.

mxsdlr commented 8 months ago

Great idea! I'd also like to take part in this.

squillace commented 8 months ago

@squillace says LGTM!

witterauf commented 8 months ago

I think embedded devices are an important target for WebAssembly, so this is great.

dphilla commented 8 months ago

This is great! I also support this and would love to be involved.

dongsheng28849455 commented 8 months ago

This is great! I also support this and am willing to participate in it.

beriberikix commented 8 months ago

Sharing my enthusiasm for this proposal and place to drive the use of WebAssembly and WASI in the embedded space! Many of us have tried, failed and learned through experimentation over the last 6+ years and would love to work on this together as a community. The time is right ❤️

xtox-io commented 8 months ago

Perfect looking forward for the details

rockwotj commented 8 months ago

Looks like some great discussions have been happening here. I had a good chat with @woodsmc the other day and I am in support of this SIG. Redpanda is by no means an embedded system, but it accepts many constraints that embedded devices have in order to increase performance (i.e. around memory fragmentation and limits).

woodsmc commented 7 months ago

After a discussion with the TSC and members of the wider embedded community we will rework the charter and resubmit a new PR shortly.