Open yurydelendik opened 4 years ago
e.g. cranelift-faerie?
Rather add common code to for example cranelift-module
and then implement this in both cranelift-faerie and cranelift-object.
Should I rebase https://github.com/bytecodealliance/cranelift/pull/902 against wasmtime? That PR added this feature to cranelift-faerie
, though I had taken the lack of approval and your comment about cranelift-module to be a request for an approach more like #1181 (less focused on cranelift-faerie specifically)
Why does this issue close #1284? These two changes seem completely unrelated
Cranelift recently got merged into the wasmtime repo. All issues have been migrated to the wasmtime repo, but this has renumbered all cranelift issues.
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift"
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json
configuration file.
This is a continuation of #53
We save .debug_frame section in wasmtime's JIT and wasm2obj. It will be nice to move this capability to the cranelift level (e.g. cranelift-faerie?).
This issue may intersect with #1181 for linux and macos platforms.