Here you saying "Smaller boilerplate code makes examples easier to read and understand". It's not true. I don't know scala and I bet most JVM-based code is on Java. In order to understand your example I have to learn scala first, which I don't want to.
And I'm really wondering why JavaCV has examples in Scala. Then you need to call it ScalaCV. Even Lightbend Akka documentation has examples in Scala and Java.
Yes, I totally agree, but someone needs to do it. If you would like to give it a try, let us know when you're having issues understanding the code and we'll help. Contributions are welcome!
Here you saying "Smaller boilerplate code makes examples easier to read and understand". It's not true. I don't know scala and I bet most JVM-based code is on Java. In order to understand your example I have to learn scala first, which I don't want to.
And I'm really wondering why JavaCV has examples in Scala. Then you need to call it ScalaCV. Even Lightbend Akka documentation has examples in Scala and Java.