Closed skyler237 closed 6 years ago
I could be wrong but I thought that the old way was appropriate for using image transport. Maybe I need to be educated at why this is better.
I also am not too familiar with image transport, so correct me if I am wrong, but I had problems passing the gimbal plugin data to the visual_frontend node (using image transport) because the gimbal was publishing on the topics /camera/image_raw and /camera/image_raw/camera_info, but image transport seemed to expect the image_raw and camera_info topics to both be under the same namespace (i.e. /camera/image_raw and /camera/camera_info.
I'm not sure what the difference between the old and new ways of using image_transport are but having the option to change topic names in plugins is useful I think.
I also just changed image_camera_info_topic to camera_info_topic and removed the weird tab
This helps to make applications using image transport easier