Closed einsiedlerspiel closed 10 months ago
I very much agree with your request. I think it's right cl-collider's APIs to be compatible with sclang (if they don't break CommonLisp's conventions too much). There are many mistakes left over from the early days when I was the only one using it, and I plan to accept corrections for these even if it is late. I'll see if there are any other issues and merge them as soon as possible. Thank you.
I think server-free-all
is better than free-all
as a new name.
Yes i think either server-free-all
or something like free-all-nodes
would be better. Esp. because it doesn't free busses.
Should i change it to server-free-all
or do you want to do it yourself?
plz change it to server-free-all
. thanks! :-)
Implement
group-free-all
as a function that frees all nodes in a group without freeing that group.Rename the existing
group-free-all
tofree-all
, to better reflect what it does and allow for consistency with sc.If the latter is too much of a breaking change, I'd be happy to reverse it and give the new function another name. Maybe
free-in-group
?