Hello! 👋 I noticed that, at present, the library doesn't expressly identify itself as being a PSR-3 compatible provider (psr/log-implementation.) This canapparently be inferred by the psr/log requirement, but I'm not certain how reliably that works for downstream packages that require the implementation form.
Not sure if adding this interests you, but thought I'd throw it out there. Cheers! 👍
Hello! 👋 I noticed that, at present, the library doesn't expressly identify itself as being a PSR-3 compatible provider (
psr/log-implementation
.) This can apparently be inferred by thepsr/log
requirement, but I'm not certain how reliably that works for downstream packages that require the implementation form.Not sure if adding this interests you, but thought I'd throw it out there. Cheers! 👍