Closed justinjj24 closed 1 year ago
no we keep the mention of high quality reads
... even if indeed there hasn'nt been any NGS delivered with non PF PASS
for 10+ years.
@mhebrard please take note of the typo also informed of the typo in https://github.com/ga4gh/quality-control-wgs/issues/9#issuecomment-1504602516
expluded -> excluded
Good to include the comment given below or remove the
high quality
from the description? Thehigh quality
reads also not part of the description in the proposed GHIF WGS QC document!Mean autosome coverage
doesn't select high quality reads usingmosdepth