C-SCALE VA Agreement

[sebastian-luna-valero]

Hello,

We would like to capture the allocation of VA offered by GRNET and CREODIAS to the HiSea Use Case in the following confluence page:

https://confluence.egi.eu/display/CSCALE/C-Scale+VA%3A+HiSea

As a reference see the Aquamonitor VA agreement below:

https://confluence.egi.eu/display/CSCALE/C-Scale+VA%3A+Aquamonitor

Please do not hesitate to contact @enolfc or myself if you need further help filling this out.

Many thanks, Sebastian

cc: @sandragaytan @kkoumantaros @MZICloudferro @backeb

[lorincmeszaros]

@backeb since you have started this with Sandra, shall we have a look at it together to fill in for HiSea?

[backeb]

@backeb since you have started this with Sandra, shall we have a look at it together to fill in for HiSea?

@lorincmeszaros I think this is something for the providers to track and provide info on. @kkoumantaros @MZICloudferro @sebastian-luna-valero correct?

[sebastian-luna-valero]

The action is for both use case leaders and service providers. The goal is to write down the amount of computational resources (compute in CPU hours, storage in TB month) agreed upon to carry out the use case. This is a replacement for the EGI SLA/OLAs. Please see: https://confluence.egi.eu/display/CSCALE/C-Scale+VA+agreements

On the other hand, https://confluence.egi.eu/display/CSCALE/C-Scale+VA+installations is the place where providers track and provide info about resource allocation and usage.

[sebastian-luna-valero]

We need to update the VA agreement with the correct allocation for CloudFerro cc: @LukaszKubowicz

[sebastian-luna-valero]

The allocation made by CreoDIAS to HiSea was clarified via email and the confluence page (https://confluence.egi.eu/display/CSCALE/C-Scale+VA%3A+HiSea) was updated accordingly.