Feedbacks on waypoint editing

[asaunier]

• [x] Yes/no attributes (eg. "gas unstaffed") should also be set to none (if the info is not available) => the radio buttons should be uncheckable. Perhaps use a "exclusive" checkboxes that supports 0 or 1 value.
• [x] paragliding_ratings: this is not a quality rating based on stars :P Please use a standard dropdown with values 1 to 5.

[asaunier]

Concerning the organisation of the attributes (steps), it is currently a bit complicated and not intuitive. Probably too many steps.

[ginold]

I did it, but putting everything in figures makes the form very long. You forgot about contact, access, transports, ratings... But if it's better that way :no_mouth:

[ginold]

isn't a 'Rating' most commonly represented with stars ? If it's not a special value like those letters in other ratings why not use stars ? 5 = 5 stars, it's very speaking :star: :star: :star: :star: :star: Or tell me that users will not get what the stars are and are so used to a scale 1-5, then ok :P

[tsauerwein]

It's more about the difficulty of a route. For the real rating there is a field awesomeness for outings. That's where we can use stars.

[ginold]

that's exactly what I did, this time i would not let it go if it weren't stars :gun:
got it!

[asaunier]

isn't a 'Rating' most commonly represented with stars ?

That's not a quality rating. It's a difficulty indicator. A paragliding takeoff with difficulty 5 is very difficult, not very cool :P

[ginold]

whoa so difficult it must be awesomely hardcore!

[asaunier]

I did it, but putting everything in figures makes the form very long. You forgot about contact, access, transports, ratings... But if it's better that way

Don't make too much changes about this. It's still discussed by the client. I'm urging them to make a choice.

[asaunier]

Errors reported about the WP editing form:

• [x] Type "canyon" is missing in https://github.com/c2corg/v6_common/blob/master/c2corg_common/attributes.py#L17-L55

Climbing indoor:

• [x] routes_quantity => not a height, only a quantity => no need for "m" in the input suffix
• [x] elevation is not relevant
• [x] maps_references is not relevant

[asaunier]

Climbing outdoor:

• [x] orientations: use the campass instead of checkboxes (as for routes)

[asaunier]

Yes/no attributes (eg. "gas unstaffed") should also be set to none (if the info is not available) => the radio buttons should be uncheckable. Perhaps use a "exclusive" checkboxes that supports 0 or 1 value.

• [x] @ginold Are you sure this point can be checked? In the demo the yes/no attributes are still set using 2 radio buttons and it's not possible to unset them when you have checked one of the radios.

[asaunier]

Huts:

• [x] "access_period" => used to specify when the hut is open/wardened => nothing to do with an "access" => the "access" section is not relevant here. Please note the name of the attribute is different depending on the WP type (could be "période d'ouverture" for huts, "horaires d'ouverture" for local products, etc.

[asaunier]

Discussed with the client. the fields in the WP editing form must be reorganised to make it more consistent.

Depending on the waypoint_type, we would have 2 to 3 steps (not including the "preview" step before saving).

Here are the steps and fields for "simple" waypoints (summits, passes, places etc.)

step 1

title + lang waypoint_type elevation (+ prominence for summits) longitude + latitude interactive map maps_references

step 2

associations summary description quality

Fields for other types will be provided in additional comments below.

[asaunier]

climbing_indoor

step 1

title + lang waypoint_type longitude + latitude interactive map elevation maps_references

step 2

climbing_styles + climbing_indoor_types routes_quantity + height_max climbing_rating_min + climbing_rating_median + climbing_rating_max URL + phone

step 3

associations summary description quality

[asaunier]

climbing_outdoor

step 1

title + lang waypoint_type elevation longitude + latitude interactive map maps_references

step 2

climbing_outdoor_types + climbing_styles orientation + best_periods rock_types routes_quantity + equipment_ratings height_min + height_max + height_median climbing_rating_min + climbing_rating_max + climbing_rating_median rain_proof + children_proof + access_time URL

step 3

associations summary access description access_period quality

[asaunier]

accomodations

step 1

title + lang waypoint_type elevation longitude + latitude interactive map maps_references

step 2

custodianship + capacity_staffed + capacity URL + phone + phone_custodian matress_unstaffed + blanket_unstaffed + gas_unstaffed + heating_unstaffed

step 3

associations summary access_period description quality

[asaunier]

access

step 1

title + lang waypoint_type elevation + elevation min longitude + latitude interactive map maps_references?

step 2

lift_access + parking_fee snow_clearance public_transportation_rating public_transportation_types

step 3

associations summary access_period road access (= description?) public transportation access (= access?) quality

[asaunier]

Paragliding WP, webcam, weather stations: 2 steps if not a lot of dedicated attributes, 3 steps if quite a lot (eg. paragliding)

[ginold]

and have you thought about any names for those steps ? or we stick with 'figures' etc?

[ginold]

what is quality ?!

[asaunier]

have you thought about any names for those steps ?

Not yet. I ask the client and let you know.

what is quality ?!

https://github.com/c2corg/v6_api/blob/master/c2corg_api/models/document.py#L65 It's a meta attribute about the status of the document: https://github.com/c2corg/v6_api/blob/master/c2corg_api/models/document.py#L28-L34 useful to figure out the documents that must be improved (or even not publicly listed, for example the empty outings).

[asaunier]

Fixed by #266