Closed asaunier closed 8 years ago
Having outings directly associated to climbing sites as in v5 is not possible. And not a good thing because it would create another exception. It's better to keep the standard relationships between pages: waypoints <> routes <> outings
Here is a possible workflow for v6:
By the way: in v5, it is not possible to create outings associated to indoor climbing_sites. In v6, I suggest to drop this restriction: same behaviour for all WP (summits, accesses, indoor climbing sites, outdoor climbing sites, etc.).
For migration : created generic route For outing : route needed No direct outing with WP
By the way: in v5, it is not possible to create outings associated to indoor climbing_sites
In V6 it will be possible to create routes associated to each type of WP (even indoor climbing_sites), and then to create outings on this routes.
Closing this issue because:
I have noticed there is a "add a new outing to this document" button in the list of recents outings in a WP detail view page.
I am not sure it is relevant since it opens the outing creation form with a GET parameter
?waypoints=123456
=> but it doesn't really help choosing a route to be associated to the outing.On the other hand it would make sense to show an "add route to this WP" button in the WP detail view pages (as in v5).
In v5
The "add an outing" button is only available in the route detail view page, not in the summit detail view pages. For instance: http://www.camptocamp.org/summits/40576/fr/dome-des-glaciers On the other hand the summit detail view page offers a "add a route" button.
Climbing outdoor sites are an exception in v5:
In v6
This is a quite complicated topic...