Closed lrosenthol closed 2 years ago
Section 7.1 uses "DID" as a unique document identifier. This seems to redefine the definition as used by XMP.
In XMP, DID is the document identifier (identifies the parent source). IID is the instance identifier (identifies the current save/alteration). With XMP, "save as" creates a new DID and IID, while "save" only changes the IID.
The change here would be in 6.2, Other Identifiers. TWG agrees to add this.
Such guidance is given in the second public draft of the document.
From the W3C's Credential CG
Absolutely! The Schema.org grammar for a CreativeWork – which is a component of the C2PA manifest – has a pre-defined field called (oddly enough)
identifier
which would be the logical spot for the asset’s DID to be recorded. You can use additional CreativeWork fields to refer to other referenced/linked works if you wished.In addition, the DID could serve as the
instanceID
for a claim or ingredient.