Closed JacoboWitness closed 2 years ago
Given issue #607 around scrubbing entity names from C2PA public docs - flagging that several named entitities e.g. Apple, John McAffee, and others are called out as examples in this doc?
Blockchain-enabled C2PA systems would be part of a broader high-energy consumption ecosystem. The assessment however reflects the assumption that these systems would operate with proof-of-stake models
May be better to state 'systems would not use proof-of-work models' since several low energy DLT exist e.g. PoS but also PoH for Solana and others.
This doesn't go in this repo...Closing the review
Adding updated version of 0.8 Harm Assessment, and deleting previous placeholder.