We already have a lot of plumbing for Intel syntax, but no parser. Making an Intel parser that's as liberal at accepting real-world x86 as the AT&T one shouldn't be too hard, just time-consuming.
The real question is what we would gain from doing so—clang and gcc both emit AT&T assembly, so this'll only become useful once we target a compiler that doesn't
We already have a lot of plumbing for Intel syntax, but no parser. Making an Intel parser that's as liberal at accepting real-world x86 as the AT&T one shouldn't be too hard, just time-consuming.
The real question is what we would gain from doing so—
clang
andgcc
both emit AT&T assembly, so this'll only become useful once we target a compiler that doesn't