Updating build workflow

[c4deszes]

Brief

• Updated and added CODECOV token to the workflow, disabling CI failure conditions for now
• Updating action versions to latest (node16 deprecation)
• Added stable Python versions to test the library with (3.10, 3.11, 3.12)

Checklist

• [ ] Add relevant labels to the Pull Request
• [ ] Review test results and code coverage
  • [ ] Review snapshot test results for deviations
• [ ] Review code changes
  • [ ] Create relevant test scenarios
  • [ ] Update examples
  • [ ] Update JSON schema
• [ ] Update documentation
  • [ ] Update examples in README
• [ ] Update changelog
• [ ] Update version number

Evidence

• Release workflow is only impacted by the checkout version update which should be fine, the rest is checked under the PR.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (2fe6236) 96.28% compared to head (b3babe4) 96.28%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #132 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 96.28% 96.28% ======================================= Files 13 13 Lines 1453 1453 ======================================= Hits 1399 1399 Misses 54 54 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [3.10](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `96.28% <ø> (?)` | | | [3.10.0b1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `?` | | | [3.11](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `96.28% <ø> (?)` | | | [3.12](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `96.28% <ø> (?)` | | | [3.6](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `96.28% <ø> (ø)` | | | [3.7](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `96.28% <ø> (ø)` | | | [3.8](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `96.28% <ø> (ø)` | | | [3.9](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `96.28% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/c4deszes/ldfparser/pull/132/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes) | `?` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Bal%C3%A1zs+Eszes#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.