Closed pieterlukasse closed 5 years ago
overlaps with #244 and #249
Actually, dataset counts are problematic in general since they currently rely on data administrators to correctly set the stable_id of case lists as (not yet completely) documented here: https://github.com/cBioPortal/cbioportal/blob/rc/docs/File-Formats.md#case-lists
Part of the solution would maybe be to have a real link (referential constraints) between genetic_profile
and sample_list
tables. Another part of the solution is also found in the discussion on topic #494
@paulcwvandijk is this still an actual issue in your recent experience?
@pieterlukasse I haven't come across this problem yet. I will re-open this issue if such a situation arises
@jjgao what about
Glioblastoma (TCGA, Nature 2008)
TCGA, Nature 2008 206 91 206 0
why does it report 0 samples for RNA-Seq? From the heatmap it looks like it has data:
that's microarray data, not rnaseq.
When there are multiple datasets of the same type (same genetic_profile.datatype) in a study, then the sample counts in the Data Sets overview UI (see screenshot) are possibly not correct.