It's been requested multiple times to have AND logic for OQL and I just bumped into it again.
Maybe instead of supporting that between tracks (which might be hard), it's easier to support in in the Merged Gene Tracks of OQL, e.g. ["CDKi"& CDKN2A CDKN2B].
This will change the altered gene list, which should be propagated to other tabs, e.g comparison, cancer type summary, etc.
It's been requested multiple times to have AND logic for OQL and I just bumped into it again.
Maybe instead of supporting that between tracks (which might be hard), it's easier to support in in the Merged Gene Tracks of OQL, e.g. ["CDKi"& CDKN2A CDKN2B].
This will change the altered gene list, which should be propagated to other tabs, e.g comparison, cancer type summary, etc.
@cBioPortal/product thoughts?