Open AntoniaBerger opened 1 month ago
An other but simular approach would be to model the filtration inside the CSTR: We start again with the CSRT equations: $$\frac{d(c_i^{P}V^{P})}{dt} = Q^P ci^{in} - Q{out}c_i^{P}$$ But instead of using $ri$ and $Q{out}$ as parameters, we calculate $Q{out}$ with Darcys law and a given pressure $\Delta p$: $$Q{out} = \frac{dVp(t)}{dt} = A \cdot \frac{\Delta p}{\mu \cdot (R{m}+R{c}(t))}$$ and with $$R{c}(t) = \alpha \cdot h_{cake}(t) = \alpha \cdot \gamma \cdot \frac{V_p(t)}{A} $$
I had some thought about flow splitting: @daklauss @schmoelder
$$ Q_i^c = r_i Q_i^{in} = \frac{M_i \dot{n_i^c}}{\rho_i} $$
With that we can avoid the problem of "Volume out of nothing"- problem, if we give $Q_i^{in}$ for every componets and calculate $Q^{in}$ in a pre-process step to use the CADET interface.
The next unit should be a dead end filtration model. Here is the discussion how we would like to model this unit.
Key properties of dead end filtration
Model Approach in CADET
Objective: The model should simulate the concentration of the permeate after the filter and the pressure development of the process.
Challenge: CADET is currently limited in the sense that it can only process volume flow and concentration as input variables, so @schmoelder and @daklauss have developed a design based on the CSTR system.
With the following differential equations:
$$ V^{c}(t) = Q^{c}(t0) + \int{t_0}^{T}Q^{c}(t)dt $$
With $Q^p = (1-ri)Q{in}$ and $Q^c = riQ{in}$, where $r_i$ is the ratio of how much of $c_i$ is rejected (how do we get to $r_i$? With R(t)?). We use Darcy's law to calculate the other objectives:
$$ \Delta p = \frac{\mu R(t) Q^p(t)}{A} $$